Fossil Fuel Subsidies.

Fuel subsidies for fossil fuels are one of the most major financial hurdles to the world’s move away from fossil fuels and toward alternative energy sources. 

Every year, governments spend more than half a trillion dollars to artificially lower the price of fossil fuels.  While combined renewable energy technologies subsidies are less than 200 billion.  Everyone agrees that something has to be done about fossil-fuel subsidies. 

The rhetoric and reality are far from on the same policy page.  At least 53 countries modified their fossil-fuel subsidies between 2015 and 2020.  All governments must remove fossil fuel subsidies during the next several years if dependance on oil is going to cease.

Subsidies for production are tax breaks or direct payments that are used to lower the cost of coal, oil, and natural gas extraction and processing.  Consumption subsidies lower gasoline prices for end users by controlling the price at the pump so that it is less expensive than the market rate. 

It is estimated that 52 advanced and emerging economies account for roughly 90 percent of global fossil-fuel supplies. 

Groups, on the other hand, differ in their approaches of assessing subsidies.  Some public support of fossil fuels mixes subsidy and non-subsidy components. 

Researchers believe that the hidden costs of fossil fuels emission are a form of subsidy since polluters aren’t held responsible for their behavior and do not have any additional costs for polluting. 

Furthermore, each government has its own set of grounds for subsidizing fossil fuels, which are often intertwined with the country’s industrial strategy. Producer subsidies are one of the most significant obstacles to abolishing.

Using money that would otherwise go to fossil-fuel businesses might help to mitigate the effects of rising energy prices.  Governments also need policy for supporting fossil-fuel personnel in obtaining other employment.

Withdrawal of energy subsidies is to maintain support while making it contingent on a move to cleaner energy sources in favor of diversifying into renewables.  Taking subsidies away would be seen as a shock, he claims, and would have an impact on consumers as well. 

It is not enough to merely phase out substandard products we need to fund them with at least the same level of financial support we have provided to the industries that have and continue to magnify the scope of the problems.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *